The Land Registry privatisation public consultation notes that 13% of land and property title is not registered and that could undermine lowest cost identity verification due diligence, credit scores and increase non-compliance rates to maintain the People with Significant Control register.
The Land Registry privatisation debate could progress open data and risk management with total registration and purchase options and — I am not familiar with the dataset — perhaps price first advertised by each agent, unique landlord reference and compulsory purchase reference.
Anyway, one response to the public consultation, prompted by the Open Data Camp in Bristol:
Pingback: After the Watershed | Open Data Camp UK
Pingback: After the Watershed – AHA Digital
Pingback: A look back at Open Data Camp 3: After the Watershed | markbraggins